A 15-year lobbying effort to have Morningside Heights designated a historic district is about to pay off, but the area marked for approval may be much smaller than some had hoped.
Since 1996, the Morningside Heights Historic District Committee has argued that the area from 110th to 129th streets, between Riverside Drive and Amsterdam Avenue, is worthy of historic district status from the Landmarks Preservation Commission, pointing to its architecture, elevated natural boundaries and high density of historic institutions. Yet since the commission officially began discussions in September 2010, it has agreed to cite only the area between Claremont Avenue and Riverside — a small fraction of the original proposal.
Gretchen Borges, vice president of the Historic District Committee, says the original proposal does a historic neighborhood greater justice. “All the land was owned by institutions for a long time, so when development occurred, it occurred all at once,” Borges said “So the neighborhood seems all of a piece because it was basically built all at the same time, and that’s not characteristic of the rest of New York. It makes the neighborhood stand together in a coherent way that we would like to see preserved.”
The Landmarks Preservation Commission did not respond to a request for comment. Its final decision is still pending, and expected within the coming weeks.
With historic district status, Morningside Heights architecture would be protected as New York City landmarks. A co-op apartment or business hoping to replace its windows would face little conflict obtaining a permit, but ambitious changes to a building’s design would be subject to formal review with the landmarks commission.
“People are under the mistaken impression that once you’re designated, your buildings are frozen in time,” said Gregory Dietrich, the founder of Gregory Dietrich Preservation Consulting and a supporter of the historic designation. “Any visit to the Landmarks Commission on a Tuesday, when they hold the hearings, will tell you otherwise. They’re constantly approving new additions.” Dietrich points to the approval of a large addition to the base of Hearst Tower, a landmarked building on 57th Street, as an example of how flexible the commission can be.
The area encompassed by the committee’s proposal already includes several designated landmarks. The 116th Street subway station, Riverside Park and Grant’s Tomb are registered as state or national landmarks, giving the city little authority over them St. Paul’s Chapel, Fire Station 47 and St. Luke’s Hospital are already New York City landmarks.
Low Library is the only section of Columbia University currently with landmark status. Committee members note that Columbia, one of the crown jewels of the area, has been reluctant to get on board. Dietrich says that Maxine Griffith, executive vice president for Government and Community Affairs, has told the Morningside Heights group that it was premature to talk about Columbia’s involvement before the city had set the district’s boundaries. Columbia is not part of the landmarks commission’s proposal, but would be covered by the Morning Side Heights group’s plan.
But Dietrich speculates that other motives may be at work. He notes that Emily Lloyd, executive vice president of the university, commissioned an inventory on historic properties and produce design guidelines on future alterations within the neighborhood. Dietrich believes the Northwest Science Building, which began construction on 120th and Broadway in 2007, might not have received a Certificate of Appropriateness. “With district status,” said Dietrich, “at the very least there would have been consideration that this is a very historic crossroads.”
New York State Assemblyman Daniel O’Donnell, a founding member of the historic committee, notes that Columbia was actively engaged with the committee during its first proposal in 1996, but persuaded the committee not to include Morningside Drive, where the university owned property. “I think that’s ridiculous,” said O’Donnell. “What is a historic district? It’s an area where buildings are consistent. I think if you look at the structures on Morningside Drive, they are as consistent as the buildings on Riverside Drive. I would like someone to point out to me the differences.”
Columbia’s communications office did not respond to a request for comment.
Andrew S. Dolkart, a Morningside Heights historian and an architecture professor at Columbia, said he thinks the university is “perfectly happy not having landmarks in the area,” adding, “There are certainly some sites it’s no secret that Columbia would like to develop, and designation would probably inhibit it.”
Regardless of the landmarks commission’s decision, the Morningside Heights Committee plans to continue lobbying for wider district recognition. “We do have resources at our disposal,” said Dietrich.








Recent Comments